Regarding damaged note and forgery concerns
Regarding damaged note and forgery concerns
Identity area
Reference code
Publication status
Draft
Level of description
Item
Date(s)
- 18th January 1850 (Creation)
Context area
Name of creator
Mess Perkins Bacon & Vetch
Repository
Royal Philatelic Society London
Content and structure area
Scope and content
463
or that it could have been in a Juvise the whileting
masmuch as its destruction has been effected by
fils for acid which is readily tested intuvo in
first, by the discéloration of the writing math in
varioles parts wherever the acid has tathen effect
& secondly by touching the part discoloured with
the toughe whiny the presence of and ioimundar
the
is
us
ascertained. These remarks do not involve the
necessity of this destruction having been caused
wantonly or for an improper purpose, for althoug
we are not aware Jany process by which an availa
impression could be taken by the agency of acid to
: purpose of Forgery still if there be such a pract
we should unagine it would require the whole
If the Note to hlave the meid applied to it to accomplis
this object, which is not the case with that before
as by testing it with the torque we find several furts
where it either has not been applied or has not taken
feet Nothers where the writing has been only partic
discoloured. The experiment, therefore of intended for
any fraudulent purpose we consider an entire failur
quime
& Alain by comparing the Mote with one that har
with
a
Ven istned, it will be found that (if any) sufficient
int has not been removed for any sinister purpose
from the surface of the Note as to warrant a supposition
that such was the intention of the parties, we should
be inclined to think that those notes have accidentally
Jobacid on them I have thus been destroyed the howe
were reluctant to tell how the occurrence lodr place
for had any fraudulent experiment been successful
"we deem it most unlikely that the parties would
present the genuine notes that had been tampera
with for payment as they would in all probability
be the means.
means of leading to the detection of the offenders
a Patien
We have herewith the pleasure t
returning the damaged Note & ofeneloding
of an Je to the present time as requested,
Premang. Scullemen, respectfully
Your bed Lezoto
Mestre Micolle de M Croit,
Bertram Malzard & Co
Jersey
Gentleman,
Note9 Reef Street
18th Jaur 1850.
We by to acknowledge receipt of
Your favor So yesterday's date & we have applied
obedience to its direction to mess dubbock tes
for the amount of our a/c £20.16.3 for which
tender our thanks.
ше
We have for some time been aware
that forgers have been busy, imitating Notes in
various parts, but at the same time we are
happy to observe that those four Customers have
entirely escaped_ it is naturally their pediey to
silect those easiest finitation Vasajeneral rule
ours are extremely difficult in some case quite deaure
from Forgery. On your Notes the work fits kind
is of the best possible description, but is certainly not
Seawel, we would therefore suggest that you should
either have borders be added to your present brote
or have entirely new ones comprizus with the worle
already on them complicated work of other character
thereby rendering them secure or retaining them
their present state with the addition of avery clabrate
465
beautiful back which we feel quite confident
will dezy imitation. If yan wil therefore hand
you
Kindness to say in which way you would with le
desired security to be effected we will immediately
on receiving four instructions send docere a drawing
fnew Note or specimen of presentarote as allend
or Specimens backy, and lastly you
have a bacts in addition to the New or altered hote
a in you could Scoure
if you preferred it. Whefuel auch inclined to things
that the altered note with the back would be the
prderable mode of securing you from Forgery,
best shall be happy to carry out your
any way you may think proper-
your views in
We are, Southmn, respectfully
your of y, Sepoto
Mepps
J. W. Matthews & Co
Hereford.
Gentlemen,
Jio by Hack Dreek
De Fibruary 1850
My have this eyeing the pleasure
Pforwarding & Railway a Parcel divided as uden
4/6
Cour
Containing 24 3
Not with the rate for Bill Hamps
206 206. 200
agreeably to your faver of the 30th Geltokine reply tothes
latter part of which we by today that the appearance
of the 2.25 Notes A your bank fully justify
remarks and we are very much mortified that thing
Mould have so worn. Ou referring to our letters al
Mytime they were printed we find yondent us a
Z20. Pork bill as a sample of which you approvd
If
and our Mr. Bacon selected a paper which the
Able
imagined would nearly reable if and course
naturally expected lowear well. His with very
Great repet, westate so you that ze (Mor Bacon) has
been confined to his House Here very severe illus
our
our MrPolch who
new nearly treat Mouths and an overzette
signs this fetter begs toffer his opinion, viz that the
Man who sucked the Notes in
question has pery
-mitted his paper to get too wet & consequently the
Sijl on the surface has been disturbed while wound
produce the flunky feel Zappearance, which
these notes have – The Paper of the Lieffield Negle
forwarded by you is considerably thicker than
His well sized. We have enclosed,
For your
inspection 5. Samples of Paper No331. 35. 36. 377834
about the Stoutung's yaoill have the kindnes
Seems to require - Should
you approve of them
To send us the Ato of that you select, we will have,
Some inquidiality made and will take good
care that our instructions as to its strugth &
durability should be properly attended to.
In conclusion we wouldbestoffer
to resize any of the Motes that may not have been
iflyzed,
which would certainly greatly improve
them and further if you are of opinion that the
unfortunate occurrence calls for an allowance
frome us, we should most cheerfully comply
with your withes my that particular
also
very respectfully
Myth Taylor & Lloyd's
Birminghan
You
Conditions of access and use area
Language of material
- English
Notes area
Note
Summary: The letter discusses the examination of a damaged note suspected of forgery, concluding that the damage was likely accidental and not fraudulent. It acknowledges receipt of a previous communication and suggests security improvements to prevent forgery.
Note
To: Mestre Micolle de M Croit, Bertram Malzard & Co, Jersey
Note
From: Myth Taylor & Lloyd's, Birmingham
Note
Date: 18th January 1850
Note
Images: 101102_0248.jpg;101102_0249.jpg
← Back to results