Discussion on Printing and Paper Quality
Discussion on Printing and Paper Quality
Identity area
Reference code
Publication status
Draft
Level of description
Item
Date(s)
- 23rd March 1849 (Creation)
Context area
Name of creator
Mess Perkins Bacon & Vetch
Repository
Royal Philatelic Society London
Content and structure area
Scope and content
413.
down
largest as well as the meation label was cut how
beförder know it seems that the tatter is rather sch
Yan desired, this however cannot be remedied
bitby atotal les Ather Paper.
Mr. Meuron propres to take the
2700 Sheets of Reach being 5400 Labels printed from
The State as first ordered, but he must absolatie
Mg25700 Sheets of React bening 9400 Label, minde from
thesceond plate as the facell if any is altogether bus
Mcannot on a
any formciple of justice be visited
own.
on us.
он
each
He must also pay us for the two we
Pilates made by his Order & afterwards abandoned
as uggles & which plates will be Twelve Suneas
on Twenty Four Sunnicas in the whole, provided the
present Mate is right, butifuct that the must be chan
We are rotting the Vaper again after
Printing as well as before das et is posible Mathema
not have understood the natural effect fivetting.
for & Copper plate Printing arolled Vaper we will
bear that, which is a heavy experell ourselves, they
we think few others would do sounder similar aran
=stances.
We have a large quantity of the led
Tickets t of the large bije vijuette habels already priva
and ready for delivery any time but only theatres que
above framed of the small are so, there many.
having bee
Hopped by your Order - We
if the
because it would be far more satisfactory tous,
to charge a Cuſtomer for an Article which is no
This
than for one which is not so, even
although the aut
is all his ours
My's Fordel Meyer 10.
We are, Suntlemen, very respecting
шешу
Your obed here to
Dear Sir,
Holy Week Street,
23rd March 1849
414
Meryard to your application to
Know why we
charge yiben Marker Ffferthun
reams
(Speimers of which you Phewwus) at 557. we have
thought a written ; would be more satisfactory
than a verbal, answer.
Our first observation is, that often,
5. Precinens you produced; two of them are fleqube,
which we know they don't work for, &azing
My Barnett
feel pretty sure they dond–a fourth, Mess-
We
we know are printed on quite a different paper
Juve suspect the same will apply to test" William de
Cheque, in fact they are not Specimens of such Cheques
28 ayl zu wel
Qud Their Cheques, such as are really in use
prepared upon Machine Paper Sprited by
Lithography froze Stone; whereas
32d
searc
yours dreon
-
hand made Paper, from Engraved Steet petates
Meet State Printing costly than theires
process are muling every one fufuchsparts 8th
3or the decurity from atteration adfar as they have
Ayy, is derived from the weathues of the size.
these
the Paper, the more the duck dicks through
Surface the greater its segurity and the worse it is
wellsized
for writing upon, & when really well sized its
Security is some.
11th Use dépotash more than 707. peppertzet team
for Cheques prepared as Wissen Parker's are, wh
my can give security, and sufficient dizuch inter
Paper & they do not; but this house
are in their character toperations what Moses
and
in our
.
Made
Conditions of access and use area
Language of material
- English
Notes area
Note
Summary: The letter discusses issues related to printing labels and tickets, including quantities, costs, and quality concerns about paper and printing methods. It also addresses the security and suitability of different papers used for cheques.
Note
Date: 23rd March 1849
Note
Images: 101102_0223.jpg
← Back to results