Discussion on Bank Note Paper Pricing
Discussion on Bank Note Paper Pricing
Identity area
Reference code
Publication status
Draft
Level of description
Item
Context area
Name of creator
Mess Perkins Bacon & Vetch
Repository
Royal Philatelic Society London
Content and structure area
Scope and content
165
I having accomplished these objects,
Bacau called upon you
and.
dum explaining
Memorandum
hewing
the eten, and shew
what extent we
ou
our eux.
hau de d
2
old prices.
what heads & to
we had concluded to reduce on
charges. In this clums. which you still hav
we show that by variain vavings, ou of which
2. per seam. the price paid the mat
we could reduce our
was.
for the Banke Note Paper
total change to 50% per 1000 Notes for Plate
Paper Pruiting. Nou had no Paper been in
an
Order.
лив
should
hand, when.
you gave
have poveused the paper at 18f-, sent it into
log
you
at 18%..
& when used exedi't it back atti
but for the purposes of this statement it is
charged you,
ummaterial what we
аб шь
could not have had altogether but 50f-per-
should have paid
the Paper maker but 187. and in the eaves
1000
and out.
this.
of
шь
above stated, no questioning of our Account
would have happened.
however that
you
had.
-
It turns out
кашь рарем
on
hand which had been bought at 20/- techer
out.
change
was.
1000.
707- instead of 50% per
tuiming to change you 70/- per
course the paper should be exedited
Were we cou
1000
of
containing
at 20f - but in reducing
inducements which
our charge to 30%- ouerfi
you
шеле
166
the paper at the reduced price, and consequently
as you supplied us with the paper instead of
the paper makes it should be at 187– which
was our inducement for redueing to 80%-
this tome that our Clerk being informed that from
charch 10tsts your charge was to be 50%- instead of
70s made out three quarterly Accounts so,
credited the old price for Paper without chewing
ins the accounts before sending them, and as he
has done so and recipts have passed, we do not
wish to open already settled Accounts; but they have
been so made out & settled in essor,
всего
not think that the Divietors will wish to deprive
аи
and
us of what is justly due to us ou au
Account merele lucause we have inan
x
we do
unsettled
in advertully
injured ourselves in former Accounts. –
We do not wonder at the first bluit of the subject,
themen thinking we are in errot, but
to find gentlemen thinking
we beleive a
all that we are
It is a
ки
thorough examination will convince
night.
separate subject, but elit. Me live thunks that
a short time back when the Order was giver for
Bank Note Paper in answer to a
closes choute frase if
we
question
question from Sie
could not reduce our
price, althé our elit. Bacou answered it was
already
in
O
informed of
in writing at the time was, a saving of 27.1
reau in the cast
жань
of
Paper: this being the case
the evidence in
kyou have the
that we
your
owen.
hand.
out our
ase outy stating facts, it secuus to us
most plausily to follow, that making
hill at 50/- instead of Jof-
лив
шель
аркиши
impossible after what had been done, that he
dded he would see if 10 per cent could not be
reduced in the price of the paper; if he said to
it has entirely excaped his recollection, and we
will see
if
we
can.
get any further reduction in
the Paper, but it should be collected that the
Paper cleakes pays himself, for your Water master
moulds which is quite unusual, and that making
Bank etote Paper is a very difficult thing
Conditions of access and use area
Language of material
- English
Notes area
Note
Summary: The letter discusses the pricing adjustments and reductions related to Bank Note Paper, explaining the calculations and justifications for changes in charges and accounts.
Note
Images: 101102_0099.jpg
← Back to results