Discussion on Bank Note Paper Pricing

Discussion on Bank Note Paper Pricing

Identity area

Publication status

Draft

Level of description

Item

Context area

Name of creator

Mess Perkins Bacon & Vetch

Repository

Royal Philatelic Society London

Content and structure area

Scope and content

165 I having accomplished these objects, Bacau called upon you and. dum explaining Memorandum hewing the eten, and shew what extent we ou our eux. hau de d 2 old prices. what heads & to we had concluded to reduce on charges. In this clums. which you still hav we show that by variain vavings, ou of which 2. per seam. the price paid the mat we could reduce our was. for the Banke Note Paper total change to 50% per 1000 Notes for Plate Paper Pruiting. Nou had no Paper been in an Order. лив should hand, when. you gave have poveused the paper at 18f-, sent it into log you at 18%.. & when used exedi't it back atti but for the purposes of this statement it is charged you, ummaterial what we аб шь could not have had altogether but 50f-per- should have paid the Paper maker but 187. and in the eaves 1000 and out. this. of шь above stated, no questioning of our Account would have happened. however that you had. - It turns out кашь рарем on hand which had been bought at 20/- techer out. change was. 1000. 707- instead of 50% per tuiming to change you 70/- per course the paper should be exedited Were we cou 1000 of containing at 20f - but in reducing inducements which our charge to 30%- ouerfi you шеле 166 the paper at the reduced price, and consequently as you supplied us with the paper instead of the paper makes it should be at 187– which was our inducement for redueing to 80%- this tome that our Clerk being informed that from charch 10tsts your charge was to be 50%- instead of 70s made out three quarterly Accounts so, credited the old price for Paper without chewing ins the accounts before sending them, and as he has done so and recipts have passed, we do not wish to open already settled Accounts; but they have been so made out & settled in essor, всего not think that the Divietors will wish to deprive аи and us of what is justly due to us ou au Account merele lucause we have inan x we do unsettled in advertully injured ourselves in former Accounts. – We do not wonder at the first bluit of the subject, themen thinking we are in errot, but to find gentlemen thinking we beleive a all that we are It is a ки thorough examination will convince night. separate subject, but elit. Me live thunks that a short time back when the Order was giver for Bank Note Paper in answer to a closes choute frase if we question question from Sie could not reduce our price, althé our elit. Bacou answered it was already in O informed of in writing at the time was, a saving of 27.1 reau in the cast жань of Paper: this being the case the evidence in kyou have the that we your owen. hand. out our ase outy stating facts, it secuus to us most plausily to follow, that making hill at 50/- instead of Jof- лив шель аркиши impossible after what had been done, that he dded he would see if 10 per cent could not be reduced in the price of the paper; if he said to it has entirely excaped his recollection, and we will see if we can. get any further reduction in the Paper, but it should be collected that the Paper cleakes pays himself, for your Water master moulds which is quite unusual, and that making Bank etote Paper is a very difficult thing

Conditions of access and use area

Language of material

  • English

Notes area

Note

Summary: The letter discusses the pricing adjustments and reductions related to Bank Note Paper, explaining the calculations and justifications for changes in charges and accounts.

Note

Images: 101102_0099.jpg
← Back to results

Holdings

↑ Up one level

Scroll to Top